20 Mesmerizing Photos of Moscow Dated Early 20th Century
Uruguay will receive first batches of Pfizer and Sinovac vaccines late February or early March: US$ 120 million investment
Letter: Tulsa teachers show amazing skill while distant learning
Annual Knippa lecture makes move to virtual format due to pandemic
43 execs who will run merged Fiat Chrysler-PSA
Happy birthday, Oral Roberts: Take a look back at his life and legacy
GALLERY: Your snow day pics from across Swindon and Wiltshire
Tadawul approves listing of $790m govt debt instruments
Biden Administration to ‘Continue to work with Partners to Counter Iran’s Malign Influence’
Google data shows people are staying at home less than March
BBC Weather: Exactly what time it will snow in your part of London today
Jets score 4 in third period, beat Senators 6-3
Garage doors come in many styes, shapes
Tokyo 2020: USWNT star Megan Rapinoe would be ‘devastated’ if Olympics cancelled
Phippsburg oyster farmer builds community at home and business afar
$ 588.6 Bn Worldwide Platelet-Rich Plasma Market to 2027 with COVID19 Impact Analysis
Legislature actions must be in public
‘Love Letter’ to Wuhan During Lockdown Faces New Outrage
The ‘Impossible’ Relationship and History of Disputes between Lebanon’s Aoun, Jumblatt
Eleven miners saved in China after two-week ordeal, as rescuers race to find remaining 10
They lived a 'double life' for decades. Now, these gay elders are telling their stories.
Ohio Supreme Court rules in favor of city in case brought by South Euclid Municipal Court

SOUTH EUCLID, Ohio -- The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled in the city’s favor in the case in which the South Euclid Municipal Court Judge Gayle Williams-Byers sued South Euclid for not providing the full funding the judge requested.The Ohio Supreme Court, in its ruling, stated, “When a statute grants the legislative authority discretion to determine funding for a particular budget item, a city may refuse to fund even reasonable requests by a court -- The burden is on the court to establish that the city’s allocation constitutes an abuse of discretion.” It was further stated in another portion the supreme court decision that, “The judge’s request for this funding increase came at a difficult time for the city.” Judge Gayle Williams-Byers Williams-Byers had asked the Ohio Supreme Court to give the municipal court the difference between what she had requested and what the court had thus far received.
The supreme court stated that it questioned “the judge’s sincerity” with regards to her statements regarding attempts to conserve discretionary funds for a future system upgrade.” In reasoning its decision, the supreme court stated that it understood that a municipal court, in some situations, may exercise its power to compel essential funding, when necessary, to preserve judicial independence.