Did you know that a Higher Power brought me to Fluther, ...
Pursuit That Began in Ontario Continues Through the Streets of LA – NBC Los Angeles
Federal Government confirms doctors will bulk bill AstraZeneca vaccine
PT Changes and AT bringing forward Electric Buses / News / News / Railpage
TV company apologises for reports on Moldovan NOC President alleged rule breach
Mobile giant gives out school packs
Xinhua world news summary at 1130 GMT, Jan. 24
McGregor Knocked Out By Poirier At UFC 257 – Channels Television
Ministers urged to show up during topics of debate
Who's worthy of Rock Hall?
American viewers now spend $47 a month on streaming services
Kuwait emir reappoints prime minister to form new cabinet
Burnley 'low point' can inspire Liverpool turnaround
France imposes new border controls to curb virus spread
India Gives Coronavirus Vaccines to Neighbors as it Pushes Vaccine Diplomacy
Pirates kill sailor, kidnap 15 off Nigeria —report
India's Opposition Congress Party Leader Rahul Gandhi Slams Modi Gov't Over Rise in Fuel Prices
BBC educational programme tells 9-year-olds there are more than 100 genders
Charlamagne Doesn't Blame Lil Wayne or Kodak for Trump Pardons
Lidl extends money off vouchers for shoppers until February – act fast
Need crust that doesn't crush my teeth and jaw.
New study questions existence of ‘gender bias’ in scholarly journals

“Although there were some differences between fields of research, our findings suggest that peer review and editorial processes do not penalize manuscripts by women,” the team of ten researchers from a handful of European universities said.The paper, published in Science Advances, said: Scholarly journals are often blamed for a gender gap in publication rates, but it is unclear whether peer review and editorial processes contribute to it.This article examines gender bias in peer review with data for 145 journals in various fields of research, including about 1.On the other hand, recent research in other fields, such as ecology, found that manuscripts submitted by women as first authors received slightly worse peer review scores and were more likely to be rejected after peer review.
While the publication gap between men and women is generally explained by persistent differences in submission rates by women in almost all fields of research, it is unclear whether peer review and editorial processes contribute to it.The researchers are skeptical that “peer review and editorial process” contribute to the presence of a gender gap in some publications.