505 new cases, 18 more deaths
Pilots threaten SAA flight plan
Caitlin Grasso
Trump tells Republican donors he'll help win Congress in 2022
Paul Pierce: I'm gonna bounce back like never before after getting fired by ESPN
Home minister’s tiffin box talk of the town- The New Indian Express
Five years after Oakland mother's mysterious death, authorities ramp up search for her missing daughter
Parents will NOT have to pay for Covid tests for children under 11 for holidays abroad
Target Sells Woke Prayer Book: "Dear God, Please Help Me Hate White People"
Fire under investigation after torching Chinese church in downtown Sacramento
Amid Kanawha's HIV outbreak, elected officials seek data inquiry, not public health solutions
Malaysia’s ‘taiko’ diplomacy in China sparks debate
Ma Rainey's Black Bottom enjoys BAFTA success - Film News
Robert Shook, sixth person shot in York County mass shooting, dies at hospital
Pirates 'super happy' for Joe Musgrove after he throws 1st no-hitter in Padres history
Asking Alexandria's Danny Worsnop Shares New Song 'Bad For You'
CAF commits to a Pan-African inter-school championship
The day before elections, Peru marks record COVID-19 deaths
DMX was a fan of 'The Golden Girls,' says Gabrielle Union
Mobile carriers tipped for robust Q1 earnings on 5G growth
Service Operations Manager
Author, journalist and whistleblower Craig Murray was found guilty last week of contempt of court for his reporting on the trial of former Scottish First Minister and former Scottish National Party (SNP) leader Alex Salmond.The 42-page verdict in Murray's case notes that the judges would have been likely, under the Contempt of Court Act 1981, to find Murray guilty of publications which "seriously impeded or prejudiced" Salmond's trial for articles he published August 23, 2019 and January 18, 2020.The judges found Murray guilty of breaching Section 11 of the contempt legislation "preventing the publication of the names and identity and any information likely to disclose the identity of the complainers" in the Salmond case.The judges summarised part of Murray's defence as "The fact that there may be some people, such as work colleagues, who might to able to identify a complainer is not sufficient for a breach of a section 11 order.
The information must be such as to lead to the public in general being able to identify the complainer.The verdict of the three judges in Murray's case, delivered in writing weeks after a short hearing, came after the publication of two reports which avoided direct criticism of Sturgeon over the Salmond affair.